User talk:Yann

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  română  español  português  English  français  Nederlands  polski  galego  Simple English  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  кыргызча  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  العربية  فارسی  +/−

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54

God is busy, may I help you? / Dieu est occupé, puis-je vous aider?

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Orthographic editor

Hi Yann, whatever happened at this blocked account is happening again here. Best, CMD (talk) 08:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Right, so ✓ Done blocked. Thanks for the reporting. Yann (talk) 08:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
New one, very odd issue. CMD (talk) 09:34, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Parliament Images Deleted

Hi Yann,

I uploaded a handful of images taken and uploaded by the UK Parliament, and you have removed them and placed a block warning on me. I uploaded these images based on the notion that images published by the UK Parliament were acceptable, with a multitude of other examples existing on Wikipedia Commons. Below are some of those instances which I based it on.

File:Clarke, May and Duncan 2019.jpg File:New Member group photograph - 2024 Parliament 09.07.2024.jpg File:Nigel Farage in Parliament.jpg

Among many others.

So if you can inform me why my images, uploaded from the same source, using the same copyright information (To my knowledge, maybe I did the wrong Creative Commons 3.0? If that is the case, a correction would have been better over an outright deletion and block warning) are any different from the aforementioned images, I would greatly appreciate it. DougDommadome (talk) 17:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DougDommadome: We don't accept NC or ND Creative Commons licenses because they're not free enough per COM:L. Abzeronow (talk) 18:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this image

Hello Yann! I want you to delete file:Agnikul logo.png permanently, as soon as possible.

Thank you, Happy editing – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 13:13, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done @Akshadev: Next time, please simply tag the file with Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7). Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:54, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did not understand. Can you give me an example? – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 15:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann Got it, Thanks! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 15:40, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Licencing

Hello Yann! Can you please tell me how and where to obtain a licence for an image? It will be very helpful if you will help me.

Yours truly, – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 10:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Akshadev: Hi, Only the copyright holder can give the license. For photographs, that is usually the photographer. In works for hire, the copyright may be transferred to a third party, the only one which can give a copyright. Yann (talk) 10:35, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 11:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 11:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 11:42, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DR problematic editor

Might want to indef-semiprotect Commons:Deletion requests/File:Micropenis erect with ruler.jpg and/or give a stern warning to that IP. I would except I've participated in the discussion itself. DMacks (talk) 16:44, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, now I see a mid-air collision with your blocking of the IP. That will hopefully solve it too:) I'll keep the DR watchlisted. DMacks (talk) 16:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Panorama of Manhattan's West Side from Across the Hudson.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 20:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zirabagtaria

I uploaded a new reconstruction of Zirabagtaria, I got permission,so please don’t delete it. Zhenghecaris (talk) 21:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC) File:Zirabagtaria on sea floor.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhenghecaris (talk • contribs) 21:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wheel warring on File:Flag of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham.svg

I had undeleted File:Flag of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham.svg to allow it to be transferred to enwiki as a non-free file. That had not been done yet, and yet you re-deleted it 8 hours after I undeleted it instead of the customary 2 days provided for transfers of non-free files. I see that it is also currently under discussion at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Flag of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham.svg, which makes wheel warring to re-delete it more inappropriate. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AntiCompositeNumber: Sorry, I didn't understand that. Yann (talk) 15:48, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to upload recent documents although I don't remember how to do so

I'm wanting to upload a few documents which had recently come up during the last 2 years (between January 2023 and November 2024) but don't really remember how to to so. It's been quite long since I uploaded documents here on the Wikimedia Commons. Could you or somebody here please help me remember these upload processes on the WC? Angela Kate Maureen talk 18:43, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tropical Storm Angela: Hi, First you have to insure that the files are under a free license or in the public domain. If you are not sure, please ask on COM:VPC with the detailed information. Then just go to Special:UploadWizard. Yann (talk) 11:32, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

fichier emis par l'armée de l'Ukraine

Bonsoir Yann Pour mes contributions sur le Wikipédia français, je me focalise plus particulièrement sur les insignes des unité militaires ukrainiennes, ainsi que sur les illustrations des articles. Avant de modifier un article sur le wikipedia français, je vérifie que l'insigne de l'unité (que je trouve souvent sur le wikipedia ukrainien) est bien l'insigne officielle (et pas l'insigne de fantaisie que certains militaire arborent), et ensuite, je met à jour le sujet sur le wikipedia français, je fait la même chose pour les drapeaux de motivation, les drapeaux d'honneur et les drapeaux de batailles des unité ukrainienne quand ils sont connus. Et 9 fois sur 10, je m'aperçois que l'auteur de l'insigne (ou du drapeau), qui devrais être {{PD-UAexMilitary}} ou le nom du concepteur quand il est connu, suivi du template {{PD-UAexMilitary}} est en fait souvent {{Own}} ou encore le nom de la personne qui à diffusé l'insigne sur les réseaux sociaux. Il n'y a pas péril en la demeure, puisque ces médias sont dans le domaine public. Simplement une erreur d'attribution facilement corrigeable. Récemment, j'ai corrigé un media importé sur Commons par un ami du projet guerre russo-ukrainienne sur le wiki français, et je l'ai vexé, bien sûr, je lui ai expliqué que "author" ne désignais pas l'auteur de l'import mais l'auteur officiel du media, et nous ne nous sommes pas fâché, au contraire. Mais comment faire pour ne pas vexer un utilisateur que je ne connais pas, dont je ne parle pas la langue, qui souvent ne parle pas anglais ni français, et qui, de toute façon, n'a pas voulu "voler" les droits d'auteur d'un media du domaine public ? C'est pareil pour les photo prises par les militaires quand elle ont un filigrane de l'unité, ou qu'elles ont été postées sur la page officielle de l'unité (celle indiquée sur le site https://www.zsu.gov.ua/) puisqu'elle doit avoir d'abord été uploadé sur le site de l'armée ukrainienne pour approbation et pose du filigrane, avant d'être publié (ce n'est pas le cas des photos des comptes personnels des soldats, qui peuvent leur appartenir) les photos elle sont {{CC BY 4.0}}. De plus, pour ajouter à la confusion, ces photos sont quelquefois diffusées par des médias, voire des agences de presse sous copyright. Merci de m'aider. Par exemple ce fichier : . Cordialement, Christian28TMA (talk) 19:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Christian28TMA: Bonjour, Avez-vous essayé de poster un message traduit avec Google Translate ? Ou de demander un utilisateur qui parle la langue du destinataire de servir d'intermédiaire ? Sinon, demandez de l'aide sur COM:VP. Il est probable que vous trouverez quelqu'un pour vous aider. Enfin, il est possible qu'il y ait deux droits pour ces images : le droit du design d'origine, et le droit de la version importée sur Commons. A mon avis, c'est certainement le case pour un design élaboré comme [1]. C'est assez complexe, et cela dépend de chaque fichier. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bot deletion request

Hi,

Can I bother you to use a bot to delete many files I uploaded? Thank you. 維基小霸王 (talk) 02:33, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will do. Yann (talk) 11:29, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edits at Village pump

Hey, I was wondering why my edits at Commons:Village pump were reverted - was the information I provided re. the Navajo flag incorrect? Thanks! Staraction (talk) 13:59, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Staraction: It is better not to remove messages once posted. You can mark the section as {{Resolved}}. Yann (talk) 15:45, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Got it - thanks, and have a great rest of your day :) Staraction (talk) 17:45, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

is Logo nicko cruises Schiffsreisen GmbH.jpg really just PD-textlogo?

Hello Yann, first I want to thank you for your volunteer work as commons admin and all your great uploads to this project. Thanks also for paying attention to Logo nicko cruises Schiffsreisen GmbH and my report about copyright violation. I not an expert in copyright, but I still think, we can not have this logo in commons. The uploader was obviously not the company itself, so the uploader is not enabled to give any copyright status. Moreover the Logo shows ®:stands for a copyrighted and registered trademark! I would appreciate, when you check once again, if we really can keep this logo on Commons. Thanks for you attention, greetings --J. Lunau (talk) 12:26, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is certainly {{PD-textlogo}}. Please check similar logos. Yann (talk) 12:29, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK than, thanks for checking again and sorry for my wrong report. --J. Lunau (talk) 12:33, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring DOGE logo talk

Hi Yann! Regarding File_talk:DOGE_Logo_as_of_November_14,_2024.jpg, would you be able to restore the original talk page? When the file was originally speedily deleted, the talk page was as well. Thanks, ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 19:39, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) ✓ Done Abzeronow (talk) 19:44, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Yann,

I understand and agree that I have "uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations." But I do not understand why you think I "have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions." I started a thread under Commons:Village pump/Copyright asking for advice, and when it was explained to me that my uploads were against the rules, I deleted them from the article. How is that going against their instructions?

Just so that I understand your message correctly: You write that this is my last warning. Are there other warnings I have overlooked?

I am of course very grateful for the files to be deleted as I don't want to break copyright laws. And I thank you for your work; this could obviously have ended very badly for me.

Best,

˜ SkaraB (talk) 22:23, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]